Jeff Veen, from a web designer's perspective,
points to some potential usability issues that users (and admins) of CMS (Content Management Servers) might encounter when using them.
My “real”
website runs
Mambo, a CMS , after some very basic tweaking and adjustments to the template, I am almost happy with it. This Weblog runs
Blogger. So, right now, I am using 2 different web publishing tools rather than implementing them from the scratch.
CMS and Weblogs are far from perfect as they are not the solution to all web publishing needs, but they are perfect if the information architecture of your website fits the publishing model implemented in the CMS or you just need some simple diary like a Weblog.
Often less customisable CMS offer “instant” installation, publishing and improved usability (such as many Weblogs if we consider Weblogs as simple CMS) versus full customizable ones such as
Typo3 or commercial CMS, where installation and customisation requires a steeper learning curve. The main issue is to balance flexibility, power and easy of set up and use, and as always, use the right tool the right job. And of course, if you dont like something that is open sourced, join them and help making it better.